The present study examined contrastively the use of interpersonal metadiscoursemarkers in 100 conclusions of testing articles written by Iranian amp; Europeanlanguage testing experts. The selected corpus was analyzed through the Dafouz rsquo;s(2003) taxonomy of interpersonal metadiscourse markers model. The resultsrevealed the metadiscursive resources are used differently both between the twolanguages. As for the two authors, the results revealed that interpersonal markerswere present in both ...